What is the ALARP Principle?

ALARP principle – reducing risks with reason

The systematic and continuous identification and analysis, evaluation and prioritisation of risks, the definition of measures to avoid, reduce or tolerate risks, as well as the definition of responsibilities and the monitoring of the success of the measures – all these points are part of risk management. The ALARP principle is a fundamental concept in risk management. It is an acronym and stands for As Low As Reasonably Practicable.

In accordance with the principle, the extent of damage and the probability of occurrence of a risk should be reduced in such a way that the maximum degree of safety is guaranteed, taking into account reasonable financial and technical expenditure. The ALARP principle has its roots in the British Health and Safety at Work Act of 1974 and was developed to promote a practical and economically viable approach to risk reduction. Since then, it has served as a guideline for the implementation of safety measures and risk management strategies in many sectors.

The benefits of the ALARP principle

The practical benefit of the ALARP principle lies in its ability to provide a sensible and balanced approach to risk management. It enables organisations to effectively reduce risk without incurring disproportionate costs or resources. Here are some tangible benefits:

• ALARP helps to utilise limited resources (such as time, money and personnel) efficiently. Investments are only made in measures that significantly reduce risk, while excessive and disproportionate expenditure is avoided.
• The principle takes into account the realistic possibilities and limitations of an organisation. This promotes practicable and realisable solutions that can actually be applied in everyday life.
• ALARP is not a rigid set of rules, but a flexible approach that can be adapted to different situations and sectors. This means that individual circumstances and specific risks can be better taken into account.
• By emphasising reasonableness and proportionality, ALARP is often easier to communicate and accept by all parties involved (employees, management, regulatory authorities). It creates a common understanding of what risks are acceptable and why certain measures are being taken.
  The approach also promotes a culture of continuous review and improvement of safety measures. Risks are regularly assessed and measures are adjusted accordingly in order to always remain at an acceptable level.

In summary, the ALARP principle helps organisations to operate effective and efficient risk management that both increases safety and remains economically viable. It offers a pragmatic approach to risk reduction that is based on actual circumstances and promotes continuous improvement.

Limitations of ALARP

The ALARP principle offers a pragmatic approach to risk reduction, but it also has its limitations. Here are some challenges:

• Determining what is “reasonably practicable” can be subjective. Differences in interpretation can lead to disagreement between different stakeholders.
• Conducting an accurate cost-benefit analysis can be complex and time-consuming, especially as potential intangible aspects such as reputation or long-term environmental damage are difficult to quantify. In addition, short-term risk reduction may neglect long-term risks and potential future developments.
• In rapidly changing environments or when new risks arise, it can be difficult to continuously identify and implement appropriate measures. ALARP requires regular review and adjustment, which can be challenging in dynamic contexts.
• Organisations may be tempted to take minimal measures to just be considered “reasonably practicable” rather than proactively implementing more comprehensive security measures. This could lead to conflicts with regulatory authorities or, in the event of an accident, legal disputes.
• The quality and availability of data to assess risks and measures can vary. Incomplete or inaccurate data can lead to incorrect decisions.
• In complex systems, interactions between different risks and measures can be difficult to predict. Risk reduction measures in one area may create unexpected risks in other areas.
• And last but not least, human behaviour is difficult to predict and control. Even well-designed risk reduction measures can be affected by human factors. It is therefore important to regularly review the measures and adjust them if necessary.

Despite these limitations, the ALARP principle remains a valuable risk management tool that enables practicable and economically viable risk reduction. However, it requires careful application, continuous review and adaptation to specific circumstances and contexts.

The visualisation of the ALARP principle

There are various ways to visualise the ALARP principle. These visualisations help to make the concepts and applications of the principle more understandable and make it easier for decision-makers and stakeholders to assess and communicate risks. The two most common visualisations are:

ALARP triangle²

This diagram shows three zones:

• Upper zone (unacceptable region): Risks are unacceptable, regardless of cost and effort.
• Middle zone (ALARP region): Risks are acceptable if they have been reduced to a level that is reasonably practicable.
• Lower zone (broadly acceptable region): Risks are so low that no further action is required other than routine monitoring.

Risk matrix

A risk matrix categorises risks according to probability and severity. In the ALARP context, different colours or shades can be used to mark the ALARP zones:

• Red for unacceptable risks.
• Yellow for ALARP risks that must be reduced if reasonably practicable.
• Green for generally acceptable risks.

Both diagrams have the advantage that they are easy to understand – even without background information. However, as the visualisations are snapshots, changes in the assessment of risks cannot be understood without additional tools, such as the use of version management systems.

Impulse to discuss:

Who decides what is “reasonably practicable”?

Notes:

[1] Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974
[2] There are two versions of the triangle: either the triangle “stands” on one side or on a point. In terms of content, this is of secondary importance, especially as ALARP is visually positioned in the centre of the illustration either way and thus focuses on the corresponding risks.

ALARA is a similar principle that is used in radiology and nuclear medicine, among others. ALARA stands for As Low As Reasonably Achievable; the focus is on the application of technical and organisational measures to reduce radiation exposure, taking into account the current state of technology and economic and social factors.

Here you can find a video on the ALARP principle.

You are welcome to share or link to the content on this page.

Here you can find additional information from our Smartpedia section: